The immigration tragedy continues to deepen with serious economic and social implications. No matter how well-intentioned the authorities are in the West, we must remind ourselves that our enemies are searching for means by which to destroy our existence.
Never forget the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood in America as explained by Shariah, the Threat to America:
"The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."
How do we know this? It was taken from captured documents found in an FBI raid. From the Shariah document:
"The Muslim Brotherhood's strategic plan for North America was a closely held secret until the FBI discovered it during a 2004 raid of a house in Annandale, Virginia. Agents discovered a secret basement containing internal Ikhwan documents, including the strategic plan titled, "An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group."
The strategic plan was written by a member of the Board of Directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America and senior Hamas leader named Mohammed Akram, and was approved by the Brotherhood's Shura Council and Organizational Conference in 1987."
This awareness should permeate our understanding whenever we apply policy. We are at war whether we want to accept it or not. Our enemies are not afraid to admit it is a war. They call it "civilization Jihad." ISIS admits they are attempting to infiltrate America and the Western World in general with one main purpose. They want to destroy Western Civilization and implement mandatory Shariah Law. What is frightening is how little our leaders admit to knowing about their efforts (remember, they were called a "JV" team?). Even when we do know, our own political ideologies seem to override any sort of sensible response. So, we continue unabated with irresponsible immigration policies designed to achieve political objectives.
The idea that immigration will turn the political direction of this nation is beyond dispute. Never mind the idea of naturalizing voters. According to Politico, illegal immigration has already decidedly turned the next Presidential election in favor of the Democratic candidate (regardless of who she or he might be) even without a single vote being cast:
"Illegal immigrants—along with other noncitizens without the right to vote—may pick the 2016 presidential winner. Thanks to the unique math undergirding the Electoral College, the mere presence of 11-12 million illegal immigrants and other noncitizens here legally may enable them to swing the election from Republicans to Democrats…."
Basically, the idea is that illegal immigrants tend to reside more in the so-called "blue states" with Democrat majorities. Since the Electoral College is based on the census and the census counts non-citizens as well as citizens, the balance of power has already shifted. It will shift even further if illegal immigrants are given a path to citizenship and the Democratic Party knows it. But that is politics. We are discussing national security. Unfortunately, at this point, it appears that political aims have taken precedence and the force of government is at work to demand submission.
Case in point. In Germany, the right to political dissent and even free speech is being threatened. Those who refuse to adopt the new orthodoxy that all immigration resettlement is humanitarian in nature and therefore good will be punished. There are already threats to deem dissenters as "xenophobic" and therefore dangerous to society. There is discussion of a government right to not only deny such dissenters the opportunity to use social media (removing the right to speech) but also to deny them access to their own children. Yes, the consideration is to remove children from those who disagree with immigration policy.
For those who doubt the attempt at censorship of social media, please check out this Bloomberg article referencing a "hot mic" request from Angela Merkel to Mark Zuckerberg to curtail anti-immigration posts deemed racist. Now, take a look at this Prison Planet article that warns that dissenters could lose their children. And, also the Google Translate of the original article in German that is referenced: Racism and Parenting: Threatening the Loss of Custody?
Now, the whole idea is that you must support the refugee immigration efforts or you are deemed a racist. And, if you don't go along you could lose your right to speak and even lose your kids. You could also lose your property. This is a direct threat in Sweden, where property can be taken from citizens by the government to give to non citizens. It is also happening in Germany. In fact, those who are unwilling to open their homes or other property to the governments control for the purpose of housing refugees are considered appropriate targets for confiscation. This is a very basic form of economic warfare.
Fortunately, these issues have not (yet) fully developed in the United States. Unfortunately, this mass migration effort is not slowing and America is considered the next target. In addition, we are already seeing political correctness to such an extent that some demand jail time for anyone who refuses to tow the official government position on climate change. Political groups are targeted for their beliefs by the IRS. We also see examples of freedoms curtailed and businesses threatened for failing to adopt the government's view on marriage. Very recently, we saw Australian prison threats for Troy Newman. His crime? He disagrees with an Australian politician on abortion. Amazingly, Troy, an American citizen, was even denied the right to fly from Denver to Los Angeles simply because the Australian government told United to do so. Why does an American airline honor the request of a foreign government over the rights of an American citizen?
How long before there is persecution of anyone who disagrees with the government's humanitarian immigration efforts? Don't forget that the Supreme Court's Kelo decision already allows the government to take whatever property they desire through eminent domain. So, you cannot say that it won't happen here. It is already happening here in many ways.
Here are three additional serious flaws with the current policy:
- If a primary goal of the humanitarian outreach is to reduce racism, why does anti-Semitism tend to rise with the influx of immigrants? The wave of forced immigration is fostering increasing racism and creating much greater tension according to a top EU official. We have already noted that none of the wealthy Arab states are willing to take in any of these refugees despite having the means to do so. So instead, the West is denying citizen rights to force countries to accept the immigrants at great expense. And many of the immigrants themselves don't want to live in a Western nation. They want their new home to adopt Shariah Law. According to a recent WND story, CAIR (Council on America-Islamic Relations) national spokesman Ibrahim Hooper stated:"If Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, it would be safe to assume that they would want to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, as most Muslims believe that God's law is superior to man-made law."
- Why is immigration policy so skewed to Muslims even though Christians are the ones facing the greatest humanitarian crisis in the Middle East? We are essentially witnessing an ethnic cleansing along the lines of the Armenian genocide of 100 years ago. Culturally, this effort to persecute Christians may have already infiltrated America even without the influx of immigrants. The shooting in Oregon is just the most recent example. And yet, the President has said virtually nothing about how Christians are the ones being targeted for death. Could you imagine if the shooter had instead killed only Muslims? We know that a clock-making Muslim boy was detained unfairly and thus merited a White House invitation. What about the Christians?
Why are we giving asylum to known criminals and terrorists? The administration has actually "tweaked" the laws to allow formerly inadmissible criminals and terrorists to enter our nation. And, they maintain a willful blindness even after refugees commit crimes or acts of terror here. As just one shocking example, the person in charge of refugees seemed to have no idea that the Boston Bombers were refugees. This was a startling finding in Congressional testimony last week. From Daily Caller (October 1, 2015):
At a Thursday Congressional hearing regarding the Obama administration's plan to welcome tens of thousands of additional refugees into the United States, the administration's top refugees official revealed that she had no idea whether the Tsarnaev brothers who carried out the Boston bombing arrived in the U.S. as refugees.
Barbara Strack, who serves as the chief of the Refugee Affairs Division at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service of the Department of Homeland Security, was grilled by the subcommittee's chairman, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama. Sessions asked Strack whether it was accurate that the two Boston bombers, Dzhokhar and Tamerian Tsarnaev, had entered the U.S. as refugees from Chechnya.
"I would need to check with my colleagues, sir," Strack replied.
The exchange can be seen at about 1:48:42 in C-SPAN's recording of the hearing.
Needless to say, the Boston bombers actually were refugees, with their parents arriving in the U.S. on tourist visas in 2002 and then claiming asylum on the basis that their ties to Chechnya could expose them to persecution back in Russia.
It seems as if the Western politicians are blinded to the damage being caused. But be certain that our enemies are not. The West is being systematically exploited and we had better wake up. There is a civilization jihad underway. It is tearing Europe apart and America is next up to bat.